while the penny-scrounging has commenced (somewhat), it's nice to know how many penies will be required...
http://jalopnik.com/the-alfa-romeo-giulia-starts-at-38-990-the-dreamy-505-1789888595
Mah, I can't see it.
Me too ... but I bought the magazine today
Summary (Giulia had ZF8HP Transmission and carbon ceramics):
- Straight line Performance was very good! 0-100/0-200 3,8/12,3
- This is AMG C63 S Level (although up to 280, the Giulia loses 8 seconds to the AMG 39 to 30,4s! Has Giulia that bad aerodynamics???))
- Engine is mighty and responsive
- QV was equipped with the PZero Corsa Assymetrico. A mixture between high Performance tire like Michelin PSS/normal PZero and a true semi Slick.
- Tracktime at Sachsenring was 1:37,37 - 0,3s slower than the 431hp M3 (sidenote: Wheather conditions were suboptimal. Dry but only 6 degrees Celsius, which might help engine power but not traction)
- Automatic ZF Transmission quite fast - even compared to other car models equipped with this tranny!
- Weight: 1675kg! (50kg more than M3/M4) Quite a let-down after all info about Aluminium and carbon usage.
- Testdriver Manuel Iglisch rated its handling/driving Dynamics high, but clearly expressed, that it is not yet on par with M3/M4
A somewhat let-down was the quality side (test car had 10000 Kilometers - hope that this is a single case as Alfa customers have struggled for long time with Alfa Quality issues):
- A-pillar casing fallen down
- clear coat of the Interieur carbon decor dispersed
- blistering of paint on the rear fenders
tks a lot for translation...
btw in this video this "manual" Giulia seems 4-5 sec faster from 0 to 280 km/h
according to Quattroruote, the discrepancy between the real speed and the speedo is just 0,8%.Thanks for sharing. Have you timed the 0-280 based on the speedo scales or did you calculate in the difference between real/gps speed and display on speedo?![]()
There are better ways to measure top speed than with GPS.the real difference, just in case of no wind involved during this test, was for two times 297,7 (and 297,8 to be precise) km/h vs 302 indicated speed and the car should have reached the 307 as declared. In this particular car the error of the tacho seems to be 1,4% at top speed.You ask about the meaning of that text? that BMW is better of course..![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.