Pictures aerodynamic/wind tunnel pictures


The 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 May Only Go 180 MPH but Its Cooling System Looks Legit
dricohpgu9zcddptkhit.webp


When the 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 debuted at the Detroit Auto Show in January, we wrote that it would “Slay Hellcats And Camaros With At Least 700 HP.” Two months later, we still don’t have an exact power figure, but we do have borderline-pornographic images of both cooling system hardware and aerodynamic simulations. Prepare your souls.

Car and Driver and other automobile websites are reporting that the Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 will be limited to a top speed of 180 MPH, and while I guess that’s interesting in that supercars tend to use top speed as a bragging right, I’m really more concerned with how this thing will handle on a track that isn’t straight.

And things that can really help in that environment are downforce and cooling—two areas linked in that they are a product of airflow (which, incidentally, is why at Fiat Chrysler, I used to work in a single department called “AeroThermal,” which dealt with both aerodynamics and powertrain cooling).

upload_2019-3-14_11-26-48.webp

Anyway, Ford just dropped some details on the new 5.2-liter supercharged GT500, highlighting in a press release how its engineers used simulation tools and 3D printing to prove out aero designs.

upload_2019-3-14_11-26-48.webp

The results of its simulation/3D printing process, Ford says, include a new rear spoiler/wing that the company calls “the swing,” which—along with an available Handling Package and Gurney flap—can yield 379 pounds of downforce at the back of the car at 180 MPH. Add a Carbon Fiber Track Package, though, and you get the Mustang GT4 race car’s rear wing, which offers up to 550 pounds of press at 180 MPH.

upload_2019-3-14_11-26-48.webp

Other aero features that Ford highlights are a belly pan, optional side splitters, and front splitter that all reduce front end lift. Another feature that FoMoCo says helps accomplish that same task is the six square-foot hood vent (with a removable rain tray), but in addition to reducing lift, it improves powertrain cooling by reducing pressure aft of the cooling module.

upload_2019-3-14_11-26-48.webp

While we’re on the topic of powertrain cooling, let’s be honest: While the pretty, colorful, modified computational fluid dynamics images above are neat, what you all want to see is cooling system hardware. And on that front, there’s good news:

upload_2019-3-14_11-26-48.webp

Oh yes, just look at that. It’s an entire front end module as seen from the rear. Among the bits shown in the photo are a 600-watt electric fan that sucks air through the radiator, AC condenser, transmission cooler, and low temperature radiator (which Ford says provides cooling to the Supercharger—presumably this means it acts as an intercooler); a fan shroud with 16 “speed flaps” to provide additional airflow and reduced front end lift at high speeds; an auxiliary high temperature radiator that gets coolant through its own thermostat; and a vent in the left wheel liner to help air flow across the fins and tubes of the remote-mounted engine oil cooler.

Yes, I did just mention six heat exchangers, and that’s not even accounting for the differential cooler at the rear of the car. Clearly, this is an impressive cooling system, and to show it off, Ford’s got a sweet labeled cutaway here to help satiate all of your cooling system needs:

upload_2019-3-14_11-26-48.webp

Have a look at those big brake ducts! Ford says they’re capable of extracting up to 100 kilowatts of heat from the 16.5-inch brake rotors, and I while that figure probably doesn’t mean much to you (it doesn’t to me), based on these images, those appear to be some big-ass ducts (here are the new Supra’s, for comparison).

And you know what else is big? The total size of the grille openings in the front end; Ford says they are “twice as large as the Mustang Shelby GT350.”

upload_2019-3-14_11-26-48.webp
 
The GAC ENO .146 is not the most aerodynamic 4 seater concept car ever released, in fact in 1985 Ford released the Probe V concept which had a CD of only 0.137. It had totally flush windows and enclosed wheels and no door mirrors.


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-01.webp



1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-03.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-02.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-06.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-05.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-04.webp


1985_Ghia_Ford_Probe-V_02.webp


85ford_probe5_03.webp
 
The GAC ENO .146 is not the most aerodynamic 4 seater concept car ever released, in fact in 1985 Ford released the Probe V concept which had a CD of only 0.137. It had totally flush windows and enclosed wheels and no door mirrors.


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-01.webp



1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-03.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-02.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-06.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-05.webp


1985-Ford-Probe-V-Concept-04.webp


1985_Ghia_Ford_Probe-V_02.webp


85ford_probe5_03.webp

i think it needs to be able to turn, unless the wheels are tucked in further than it looks like
 
Found this pretty amazing channel. Graysgarage.

Too many good videos to post so here’s the 3 gen of GTR one:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
'The Ford Probe III Concept from 1981 changed the designs of Fords for the 1980's by unleashing the art of the aerodynamic wind shaped body.

It had a CD of 0.22 (equivalent to the latest 2020 Mercedes S-class and 2021 EQE models) but had enclosed rear wheels and flat underbody.

It would be the shape of things to come with the 1982 Ford Sierra following a similar profile but had a CD of 0.34 (or 0.32 for XR4i with twin plane rear window spoiler)


1669470911371.webp


1669470650165.webp


1669470996510.webp



1669470529320.webp



1669470565242.webp


1669470605547.webp


1669470676550.webp


1669471196917.webp


1669471420232.webp


1669471989287.webp
 

Attachments

Some interesting wind tunnel test and downforce figures for various Supercars.

Audi R8 V10 5.2
(A) 2.024m²
(cd) 0.36
(cd x A) 0.72
at 200km/h
lift front 23kg
downforce rear 3kg

1669472998911.webp


Mercedes SL 65 AMG Black Series
(A) 2.17 m²
(cd) 0.37
(cd × A) 0.80
at 200km/h
lift front 56kg
downforce rear 22kg

1669473045600.webp

Ford GT
(A) 1.92 m²
(cd) 0.35
(cd × A) 0.67
at 200km/h
downforce front 44kg
lift rear 2kg

1669473082525.webp


Nissan GT-R
(A) 2,30 m²
(cd) 0,31
(cd × A) 0,71
at 200km/h
lift front 3kg
downforce rear 8kg

1669473109308.webp


Porsche GT3 facelift (996)
(A) 2.04 m²
(cd) 0.32
(cd × A) 0.66
at 200km/h
downforce front 15kg
downforce rear 19kg

1669473158704.webp


Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4
(A) 1.93 m²
(cd) 0.35
(cd × A) 0.67
at 200km/h
downforce front 4kg
lift rear 37kg

1669473182349.webp


Aston Martin DBS
(A): 2.11 m²
(cd): 0.36
(cd × A): 0.76
at 200km/h
lift front 11kg
lift rear 10kg
1669473213016.webp


Ferrari 430 Scuderia
(A): 2.02 m²
(cd): 0.33
(cd × A): 0.66
at 200km/h
lift rear 4kg

1669473258422.webp


Lamborghini Murcielago LP 640
(A): 2.04 m²
(cd): 0.35
(cd × A): 0.71
at 200km/h
downforce front 30kg
downforce rear 11kg

1669473285464.webp


Gumpert Apollo Sport
(A): 1,99 m²
(cd): 0,57
(cd × A): 1,14
downforce front 20kg
downforce rear 176kg

1669473328615.webp


Porsche Carrera GT

(A): 1.95 m²
(cd): 0.37
(cd × A): 0.72
at 200km/h
downforce front 49kg
downforce rear 40g

1669473360807.webp


Pagani Zonda F
(A): 2,08 m²
(cd): 0,36
(cd × A): 0,74
at 200km/h
downforce front 1kg
downforce rear 25kg

1669473385997.webp


Koenigsegg CCR
(A): 1,86 m²
(cd): 0,35
(cd × A): 0,64
at 200km/h
downforce front 13kg
lift rear 11kg

1669473423355.webp


 

Thread statistics

Created
Bucketslash11,
Last reply from
Revvd,
Replies
80
Views
24,621

Trending content


Back
Top