Why would you consider the i8 a sportscar?
Why would you not consider it a sports car?
ps. I as well as most here know very well you are not posing the question with any intent of learning anything about the i8 or having a healthy discussion about i8's merits or demerits, but just to troll. But you want to continue down that line, be my guest.
Honda has built the car BMW should have built instead of the i8.
You can think you know what my intentions are but you're wrong. You can't even give a reason why it should be considered a sportscar.
Easy it's not a sports car by any definition, and MX-5 is a sportscar, a Fiat Bachetta is a sports car, a Lotus Elan is a sports car, a Porsche Boxster is a sportscar, an MGB is a sports car. Something they all have in common is two doors and two seats, small size, light weight, fun vehicles to drive, something the i8 isn't. It's a GT, and obviously so. It's not a supercar either, it doesn't have the performance, if BMW had ditched the back seats, given it NSX levels of power, decent sized tyres and made it handle like a supercar then BMW would have a supercar.
Honda has built the car BMW should have built instead of the i8.
I don't know about that. I8 isnt exactly failing in sales.
Quite confrontational no?. Axe to grind? It's not your place to determine whether someone is able to give a reason or not. That's an assumption on your part.
I can't say that I agree with you in any way. Your classification of a sports car belongs back in 1982....
The 991 Carrera is a sports car - it's in fact one of the world's definitive sports cars - and it has two doors, two front seats plus two useless back seats and weighs (in comparable 4S guise) 1465 kg (DIN).
If the 991 is a sports car then the i8 is a sports car. The i8 is not a GT; a grand tourer is widely acknowledged to have its engine in front of the cabin as de rigeuer. Any mid-engined car is viewed as a sports car and upwards.
The BMW i8 is light by modern standards at 1485 kg (DIN) more so even considering its hybrid ancillaries. It's a 2 + 2 with a mid-mounted engine. Sports car <--o----------------> GT.
Who would've thought that spirit-of-footie-osmosis would take place all the way across in Norway...
I'd say that's because there isn't much else like it and the badge whores buy it because of the badge. Now there is a real hybrid supercar within the reach of most supercar buyers and not in the stratosphere like the P1, 918 and LaFerrari. Both i8 and NSX sit in the same ballpart price bracket 135,000 to 150,000 USD, so why would anyone buy a lower powered, slower i8 over a much faster NSX?
There is no reason why a GT can't have it's engine in the back. I don't even think the 911 after the 996 generation is really a sports car anymore either, it's morphed into a GT for the Carerra models and an out and out supercar for the GT3, Turbo & GT2 models, at best the line between what is a sportscar and GT with the 911 is very blurred. Porsche's sportscars are now the Boxster and Caymen.
At best the i8 is a midengined 2+2 coupe, a spiritual successor to the Dino 308 GT4 and Ferrari Mondial 8.
You can think you know what my intentions are but you're wrong. You can't even give a reason why it should be considered a sportscar.
Easy it's not a sports car by any definition, and MX-5 is a sportscar, a Fiat Bachetta is a sports car, a Lotus Elan is a sports car, a Porsche Boxster is a sportscar, an MGB is a sports car. Something they all have in common is two doors and two seats, small size, light weight, fun vehicles to drive, something the i8 isn't. It's a GT, and obviously so. It's not a supercar either, it doesn't have the performance, if BMW had ditched the back seats, given it NSX levels of power, decent sized tyres and made it handle like a supercar then BMW would have a supercar.
Honda has built the car BMW should have built instead of the i8.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.