EU confirms all new cars will be fitted with breathalysers from 2022


WBarnes

Subscriber
EU confirms all new cars will be fitted with breathalysers from 2022

fed9b150-057a-11ea-9d3f-7bbb3278ed07.webp

It is unclear how the breathalyser systems will work. (Getty)
The EU has approved a law which will see all new cars fitted with breathalysers from 2022 onwards.

The scheme was given provisional approval by the European Commission back in March this year.

It has now received final approval after politicians voted on it earlier this week and will be passed into law.

The new rules mean several safety features will now be mandatory on every new car sold within the EU, including speed limiters and breathalysers.

It is unclear whether the legislation will apply to Britain but it seems likely that if a Brexit deal passes the UK will be closely aligned to EU rules on road safety.

Timo Harakka, of the European Council, said: “These new rules will help us to reduce significantly the number of fatalities and severe injuries.”

The European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) has previously said that approval of the measures could cut collisions by 30 per cent and save 25,000 lives across Europe in the next 15 years.

Edmund King, president at AA, told The Mirror that drivers shouldn’t rely solely on the technology while on the roads.

He said: “Drivers sticking religiously to the speed limit still face the threat of smartphone zombies and other unwary road users stepping out in front of them or drunk or distracted drivers crashing into them.

“Technology will play a part but drivers should not rely solely on computers and cameras to drive their cars for them. Until fully autonomous vehicles are on the roads, drivers must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel.”

Details of how the breathalyser systems will work are yet to be revealed but it is thought they will be aimed at tackling repeat offenders.

Intelligent speed assistance is already fitted to many modern cars and uses traffic sign recognition and/or GPS location data to determine local speed limits.
 
I support this as long as the breathalyser is well integrated into the car and has removable/washable mouth pieces.
 
What a load of BS...:happy001::happy001::happy001:

Yes, how awful, trying to stop people drink-driving. :rolleyes:


I support this as long as the breathalyser is well integrated into the car and has removable/washable mouth pieces.

Who the hell wants to breathe into your car every single time you want to drive? It’s something for a convicted drunk not everyone.

M

That's exactly what will happen. The law is making the WIRING compulsory so that anybody who is convicted of drink driving will be able to have a breathaliser easily fitted to the car. It's not that every single person will have to give a breath test before starting the car.
 
The speed limiters I don't want. The breathalyser is theoretically okay until it wastes two minutes of your time when you're later for work or some other appointment.
 
That's exactly what will happen. The law is making the WIRING compulsory so that anybody who is convicted of drink driving will be able to have a breathaliser easily fitted to the car. It's not that every single person will have to give a breath test before starting the car.[...
That's actually a fantastic idea. The penalties for drink driving are generally pretty debilitating and lead to repeat offending. This would keep the public safe from drink drivers without depriving them of the ability to work.
 
Who the hell wants to breathe into your car every single time you want to drive? It’s something for a convicted drunk not everyone.

M
Yeah it’s like Betty said , but still do you need to be convicted before you have to breath ?
Maybe that conviction comes at the back of the drunk idiot killing someone or making someone handicapped?
But we should wait for that to happen just cause we can’t be assed to take a deep breath ?
 
That's actually a fantastic idea. The penalties for drink driving are generally pretty debilitating and lead to repeat offending. This would keep the public safe from drink drivers without depriving them of the ability to work.

No more driving bans for drink driving...? I'll drink to that!

Seriously though, the ban is part of the deterrent, if you don't enforce that there's less reason for people not to drink drive, and this would then only stop the people who'd actually been caught already, not the thousands/millions of people that would then feel it was a less risky proposition to have another pint before leaving the pub.

I'm not against the theory, but I think it should be in addition to current penalties.
 
No more driving bans for drink driving...? I'll drink to that!

Seriously though, the ban is part of the deterrent, if you don't enforce that there's less reason for people not to drink drive, and this would then only stop the people who'd actually been caught already, not the thousands/millions of people that would then feel it was a less risky proposi...
Larger fine, more hours of community service etc. That way the person can continue working, the economy doesn't get negatively impacted, and more revenue is raised for government spending.

In all honesty, no offender ever believes they'll get caught anyway, so the punishment only acts as a deterrent if the tenacity of the police in pursuing said crime increases.
 
But we should wait for that to happen just cause we can’t be assed to take a deep breath ?
Frankly yes. It's still better than where we're at now, where we already wait for a first offence and then let the driver return to driving after the ban without ever breath testing them prior to driving.
 
All i know is if a drunk driver takes out a kin of mine or brings them injury. It will be the last liquid he/she drinks via the mouth.

They can only hope they sell liquor in intravenous bags.
 

Thread statistics

Created
WBarnes,
Last reply from
Grosser,
Replies
22
Views
1,163

Trending content


Back
Top