• As a reminder, this section is for civil discussions only. In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

Nazi cult murderer Charles Manson is rotting in hell!


Forums New posts
Attachment browser
K

Kowalski

Banned
Nürburgring Navigator
The poster boy for why the death penalty should be applied has finally gone to hell!

:t-woohoo::greenappl:happy001::t-hands2::t-hihi::t-upside::yay::ylsuper:

The only thing that pisses me off is that taxpayers paid their hard earned money to keep that f#cking c#nt alive for so f#cking long... That's why CALIFORNIA SUCKS!

Long live Texas and other conservative states that send scum like Charles Manson straight to execution.

Anyway, rot in hell chucky... Rot in hell you f#cking nazi bastard.
 
Apparently god forgives, so he's probably not, if you believe in that kind of rubbish. Alternatively he's in a hole in the ground about to become worm food.
 
Kowalski said:
The only thing that pisses me off is that taxpayers paid their hard earned money to keep that f$%king c**t alive for so f$%king long... That's why CALIFORNIA SUCKS!
Click to expand...

The greatest costs associated with the death penalty occur prior to and during trial, not in post-conviction proceedings. Even if all post-conviction proceedings (appeals) were abolished, the death penalty would still be more expensive than alternative sentences.
 
Dauer said:
The greatest costs associated with the death penalty occur prior to and during trial, not in post-conviction proceedings. Even if all post-conviction proceedings (appeals) were abolished, the death penalty would still be more expensive than alternative sentences.
Click to expand...

It's cheap in China, same as everything else, the Chinese are super efficient.
 
Killing isn't the best solution, that is too merciful. Torture is better. And being in american prisons isn't exactly a paradise.
 
Being banished to a most remote, barren, secluded and desolate piece(s) of our planet may be the most fitting of all capital punishment alternatives. With nothing more than the clothes on the criminals' backs. And a last farewell consisting of "Deal with it, scum.".
 
Having experienced the era as a teenager, I am again reminded just how dark and utterly weird the late 1960s' were. "Flower Power" was but a very brief, heavily romanticized chapter.
 
Zafiro said:
"eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.." , no?
Click to expand...

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

... but I don't agree with Betty either. I would support the death penalty in some cases, not based on vengeful justice, simply on efficiency and risk management.
 
Matski said:
An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

... but I don't agree with Betty either. I would support the death penalty in some cases, not based on vengeful justice, simply on efficiency and risk management.
Click to expand...

In the case of proven premeditated, heinous homocide, the forfeiture of , for the lack of a better phrase, " the right to life" is a concept that is certainly comprehensible.
 
"Saving money" is not justification for killing somebody, no matter what they've done. Neither is it a deterrent. The U.S. has the death penalty and has one of the highest prison populations in the world.

It's barbaric and is not the actions of a civilised society.
 
The level of absolute depravement witnessed in perpetrators of heinous crimes may render (for them) the death penalty as a measure that is not punitive. Death, in their perception, may be a form of salvation.
 
2 disagree for asking a question. I didn't say I believe in it myself. It's a question to whether you think so or not.
 
Zafiro said:
2 disagree for asking a question. I didn't say I believe in it myself. It's a question to whether you think so or not.
Click to expand...

You were asking a loaded question, to which two people disagreed.

Put it another way, the way you asked the question implied a presupposition that you agreed with.
 

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top