Volvo & Saab Sale Thread


Bartek S.

Aerodynamic Ace
9b53431c9993c8e87a509eb4008c91b0.webp

According to latest reports, execs at Volvo are trying to ensure the carmaker goes into Swedish hands should there be a split from Ford’s Premier Auto Group. So far, Ford has denied that Volvo is up for sale but reports have emerged claiming there are several potential suitors eyeing Volvo including BMW and Cerberus Capital Management.
A Volvo insider has told Dagens Industri that management would like to see Volvo bought out by a Swedish consortium of investors, which has already gathered 54% of the estimated value of Volvo. The remaining funds would be raised through the Stockholm stock market, while Ford would retain a 10-15% holding.
No matter who buys Volvo in the end, Ford must hold on to a small stake for at least the next decade because of the high level of integration between its own models and the Volvo cars. Both carmakers share technical know-how as well as safety and electronic components.
Motor Authority » Swedish consortium eyeing Volvo
 
Ford says it’s keeping Volvo, won’t say how long

In the face of its seemingly never-ending sale of Jaguar and Land Rover, Ford says it’s going to keep Volvo, at least for the present. No long-term plans were announced for what will be the last remaining arm of Ford’s Premier Automotive Group once Jaguar and Land Rover finally part from the company. However, Ford’s goals for the brand seem to take a long view of things, focusing on cost and branding, especially since Volvo’s hybrid technology is important to the Blue Oval.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally refused to rule out a future sale of the division, but also said the plan for Volvo is to improve its cost structure and improve its brand positioning - goals that seem to aim at a longer-term vision. According to Automotive News, specific elements of Ford’s plan for Volvo include enhancing Volvo’s position as a global premium car maker, developing more appropriate business arrangements that allow Volvo to operate more independently of Ford, developing more synergies between Ford and Volvo on the development and purchasing side and disclosing individual financial performance results for Volvo beginning in 2008.

The financial disclosure is of special interest, as Volvo posted an undisclosed loss in 3Q 2007, believed to be in excess of $100 million. Independent disclosures will end the rumors and allow analysts to see how Volvo is doing as a brand, and track Ford’s work to improve it.
 
Re: Ford says it’s keeping Volvo, won’t say how long

Volvo's future isn't looking very bright. Sales are quite low and have been steadily declining the resent 2 years. It will take one very big buyer to save and keep Volvo running. I seriously doubt that there is someone other than a big manufacturer who has the balls to take on such a big task.
 
Re: Ford says it’s keeping Volvo, won’t say how long

This is getting real annoying and over-ridiculous. Ford should tell us NOW what the F they are going to do with their brands. Are they gonna be saved, sold for some pennies, or die painful and slowly?

Gosh, this is very annoying! I could trade my goddamn Volvo for a Bimmer just because i know how BMW will be after 5 years....
 
Sinking Swede? Ford devalues Volvo

096118355ef14a0edbebb79efda13cc3.webp


Ford won't say what it thinks Volvo is worth, but the Blue Oval does believe that its Swedish subsidiary is worth $2.4 billion less than it was before. Although PAG, Ford's Premier Auto Group comprised of Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo, increased its year-over-year revenue and pre-tax profit in 2007, Volvo once again posted a pre-tax loss for the year. In addition, with Ford's sales outlook for Volvo having been a bit optimistic, the brand's car production will be cut this year by 23,000 units. These are the reasons that Ford cites for the writedown, in addition to "an adverse model mix", i.e. vehicles that consumers don't seem to be interested in buying. Ford, however, says that this is not the first step in a Volvo sale and that it won't start building Volvos in America to counter the crappy exchange rates that jacks up prices.

Ford has largely kept Volvo out of the PAG fire sale discussion. Aston Martin found a new home just after it made a profit for the first time in years, and PAG's improved numbers last year were due solely to the barnbusting business being done over at Land Rover, which was good enough to put both Land Rover and Jaguar's combined business in the black. Ford has a lot of chickens closer to home that it's worrying about right now, but one wonders when it will publicly commit to doing right by Volvo (development-wise and model-wise) or commit to selling it.


Source: Sinking Swede? Ford devalues Volvo - Autoblog

:t-cheers:
 
Re: Sinking Swede? Ford devalues Volvo

I'm not surprised. Volvo has taken some bad decisions which haven't helped them at all.
 
Re: Sinking Swede? Ford devalues Volvo

^ I hope my language was not too 'colourful' ;)
 
Re: Sinking Swede? Ford devalues Volvo

Ford isn't the only problem but Volvo themselves are ruining the brand. It needs to be reshuffled.
 
Re: Sinking Swede? Ford devalues Volvo

Ford is just so stupid. The Volvo brand just like Jaguar and Land Rover has so much potential if someone at Ford just had a clue or vision. Ford management is just plain dumb.

M
 
Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

From Automotive News (Automotive News -- In-depth coverage of the automotive industry with special features for subscribers):

Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief



DETROIT -- Jerry York, a former auto executive who represents Kirk Kerkorian's Tracinda Corp., isn't shy about sharing his opinion. York said he thinks Ford Motor Co. CEO Alan Mulally will hold on to the Lincoln brand but sell Volvo and Mercury -- and that Mulally would be right to do so.
York, who met with Mulally last month, said he has great confidence in Mulally's plan to turn around Ford Motor.

Speaking hypothetically, York told Automotive News today that if it were his call, he would unload Volvo and Mercury.

"I'm very confident that (Mulally's plan) is the answer, and I think you'll see that he'll put Volvo on the market within the next year and a half," York said in an interview. "There's no rational reason for keeping Volvo or Mercury."

York said Mulally did not tell him any of his plans.

Lincoln margins 'terrific'

This week, Kerkorian's Tracinda announced that it plans to make a cash tender offer for as many as 20 million shares of Ford stock at $8.50 a share. Tracinda already owns 100 million shares, representing 4.7percent of Ford's shares outstanding.

Kerkorian's company began buying Ford shares April 2 and has paid an average price of $6.91 a share, Tracinda said. York didn't meet with Mulally until after the purchases began.

York told Automotive News that Mulally is "highly focused" on the Ford brands. "The margins on Lincolns are terrific, and my guess is that's where he's headed -- he'll probably keep Lincoln," York said.
When asked whether York would sell Mercury, he said: "Mercury, as a matter of principle, I would (sell it). But first I'd want to understand the likely cost savings versus the value loss, and that's always a difficult analysis. You have to see how many Ford customers would stick with Ford if you closed Mercury."

Asked whether he's worried that Kerkorian's involvement could distract Ford executives, Mark Fields, Ford president of the Americas, said, "We're happy that people have confidence in Ford and in our turnaround plan."

Ford has a lot of challenges ahead, Fields said in an interview Wednesday, "so we can't control what happens externally. What we can control as a team is how we're going to focus our efforts."

York was Kerkorian's representative on General Motors' board of directors from December 2005 until October 2006. Kerkorian held a 9.9 percent stake in GM at the time.

York and Kerkorian tried to push an alliance between GM and Renault-Nissan but failed. Asked whether Ford needed an alliance partner, York declined to speculate.
 
Re: Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

I talked about Volvo's down fall over a year ago, and last month the proof came in the form of a horiffic loss for the first quater of the year.

As I mentioned a few times before the car which have kept Volvo alive for the latest 3-4 years is the XC90 which account for a majority of Volvo's sales, espcially outsite Sweden. XC90 sales are like expected crumbling as the car is getting pretty old. S80 sales are incredibally poor, Ford has no cash to invest in new exciting models and looking down the line Volvo has no potencial big sellers in their pipe line.

IMO the company is doomed and if I was a shareholder I would have sold off my shares last year.
 
Re: Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

I would have dumped Mercury way back when GM dumped Oldsmobile and Chyrsler dumped Plymouth, actually before.

Maybe Toyota is interested in them???:usa7uh:
 
Re: Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

^Yeah let Toyota have'em:D
 
Re: Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

I'd say Mazda, Volvo and Ford of Europe are the only valuable brands/entities in the Ford empire. Everything else is just garbish.
 
Re: Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

Wonder if BMW would still be interested in acquiring volvo?
 
Re: Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

This guy is way off here. You can't "sell" Mercury. They're nothing but re-badged Fords! Why on earth, who on earth would "buy" that? Selling Volvo would be a mistake. Volvo is the only brand Ford has that makes money and their safety engineering expertise has been a godsend for Ford. Do the right thing and shut Mercury down and grow Lincoln.....which is what Ford is doing.

Notice all these new Lincolns, and no new Mercurys. Mercury doesn't have a single product on the horizon that isn't just a re-badged, re-grilled Ford. Lincoln's are Fords underneath also, but their styling and interior appointments are a little more unique compared to a Mercury and a Ford.

Ford isn't going to say it, but I'll be anyone here that within 5 years Mercury will go the way of Plymouth and Oldsmobile. They first have to make Ford stronger and more importantly make Lincoln stronger, then it is bye-bye Mercury. Watch and see.


M
 
Re: Jerry York: I'd sell Volvo, Mercury if I were Ford chief

This guy is way off here. You can't "sell" Mercury. They're nothing but re-badged Fords! Why on earth, who on earth would "buy" that? Selling Volvo would be a mistake. Volvo is the only brand Ford has that makes money and their safety engineering expertise has been a godsend for Ford. Do the right thing and shut Mercury down and grow Lincoln.....which is what Ford is doing.

Notice all these new Lincolns, and no new Mercurys. Mercury doesn't have a single product on the horizon that isn't just a re-badged, re-grilled Ford. Lincoln's are Fords underneath also, but their styling and interior appointments are a little more unique compared to a Mercury and a Ford.

Ford isn't going to say it, but I'll be anyone here that within 5 years Mercury will go the way of Plymouth and Oldsmobile. They first have to make Ford stronger and more importantly make Lincoln stronger, then it is bye-bye Mercury. Watch and see.


M

Very correct. Mercury's and Lincoln have been re-badged Fords all along. Change the front grill, the hood and fenders, the badging and they got another line of cars. GM and Chrysler do the same. They have been wasting money in having so many brands. Unlike Honda and Toyota, Ford, Chrysler and GM have been intoducing and killing their car brands...e.g. Intrepid, probe, Fivehundred, while Honda and Toyota have had Accord and Camry for more than 2 decades.

2008 Mercury Sable
d19f5ba4b0037f2de6ae97db3f75e870.webp


2008 Ford Taurus
df6809b2e0c4a7521a1f11e907fe1254.webp
 

Thread statistics

Created
Bartek S.,
Last reply from
bmer,
Replies
235
Views
7,251

Trending content


Back
Top