Describe the design? Are you disappointed or what?I admire what it stands for but not what it looks like.
What a design failure…
Quite clearly it was posted that it's a design failure which suggests a subjective appreciation of what the car looks like and not its commercial success.It would be a failure if they hadn't sold them all, but they have, so not a failure.
I would too.I would buy one over a W1 for example.
I've no doubt that if you're passionate about driving, particularly the purity of an analogue, manual NA experience, then this is quite possibly the pinnacle of such an experience. I reckon, when you're driving it, you're not going to give a rat's arse what it looks like.Performance is temporary, emotions are irrational & forever.
If you had read my message with more attention you would have seen that I didn’t write «sales failure». I didn’t even write «failure» in general. For me and many others this car is a massive design failure.It would be a failure if they hadn't sold them all, but they have, so not a failure.
If you had read my message with more attention you would have seen that I didn’t write «sales failure». I didn’t even write «failure» in general. For me and many others this car is a massive design failure.
Even if I didn’t have any plans of buying this car anyway, it hurts to see this bad design in a car that is so perfect and desirable in all the other ways. The design is very important, especially in this type of car.
We might have gone over this in the past, so correct me if I'm misremembering... Did they always quote 851 PS per tonne for T.50s? Because that's 772 PS / 907 kg. All the while they claim sub 900 kg.
And what's more, on road going T.50 the power to weight ratio points to a dry weight (672 PS per tonne = 670 PS / 997 kg). Am I to think that this 907 kg for T.50s is also dry weight?
Oh, so the ratio belongs to the old output of 710 PS (and it still doesn't match the 890 kg in the pdf).First it was 835 PS per tonne per the press release, then it was 851 PS per tonne per the technical spefication sheet and it says TBA per the updated technical specifiation sheet from 24th of May 2023. Website still says 851 PS per tonne tho and I can't find the (updated) technical specification sheet anymore on the website but I downloaded it all in the past. See the attachments.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.