750S [Official] McLaren 750S
- Thread starter Jonathan19
- Start date
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Jonathan19
Premium+
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
"Leiters two ways: McLaren 750S vs Ferrari 296 GTB twin test review
McLaren 750S vs Ferrari 296 GTB: the final reckoning
The Ferrari has a greater stretch, from its ability to operate on nothing but electricity, to the greater dexterity of a chassis that scythes and dances over the landscape, somehow finding traction the McLaren can’t, yet also bleeding more benignly into oversteer than its boosty British rival. It is the easier car to use on a more regular basis, and arguably the more satisfying and intuitive machine to push to its limits.
Part of that magic lies in the polish of its powertrain, which manages to integrate hybrid technology so seamlessly that from behind the wheel you’re barely aware it’s there at all, and brims with a level of response and linearity that makes the McLaren feel thuggish (though there’s appeal in that too).
But it’s also in the way the Ferrari blends in chassis-dynamics software that makes the 296 so biddable while also feeling entirely natural. And how it’s punchy steering and shorter wheelbase make you question whether it’s actually any heavier than the McLaren at all.
It might be the more synthetic-feeling supercar, but it is also the sharper, more precise and more reactive driving tool. On the practical side, it is also more frugal (even very wealthy people tire of topping tanks – though for the record the Ferrari did get a longer motorway run to achieve its tested 15.8mpg to the McLaren’s sub-10mpg). The Ferrari also benefits from a four-year warranty and seven-year servicing to McLaren’s three of each as standard.
The McLaren 750S is a triumph and runs the Italian close but it’s the Ferrari 296 GTB we recommend you put in the garage. Especially if you can grab one of those tempting used deals.
McLaren 750S vs Ferrari 296 GTB verdict
First place
Ferrari 296 GTB
Technically complex but sublime, whether in e-mode or at 8500rpm with the tyres on fire. A proper Ferrari.
Second place
McLaren 750S
Gritty authenticity meets boosty intimidation, yet compliant and useable too. Epic."
McLaren 750S vs Ferrari 296 GTB: the final reckoning
The Ferrari has a greater stretch, from its ability to operate on nothing but electricity, to the greater dexterity of a chassis that scythes and dances over the landscape, somehow finding traction the McLaren can’t, yet also bleeding more benignly into oversteer than its boosty British rival. It is the easier car to use on a more regular basis, and arguably the more satisfying and intuitive machine to push to its limits.
Part of that magic lies in the polish of its powertrain, which manages to integrate hybrid technology so seamlessly that from behind the wheel you’re barely aware it’s there at all, and brims with a level of response and linearity that makes the McLaren feel thuggish (though there’s appeal in that too).
But it’s also in the way the Ferrari blends in chassis-dynamics software that makes the 296 so biddable while also feeling entirely natural. And how it’s punchy steering and shorter wheelbase make you question whether it’s actually any heavier than the McLaren at all.
It might be the more synthetic-feeling supercar, but it is also the sharper, more precise and more reactive driving tool. On the practical side, it is also more frugal (even very wealthy people tire of topping tanks – though for the record the Ferrari did get a longer motorway run to achieve its tested 15.8mpg to the McLaren’s sub-10mpg). The Ferrari also benefits from a four-year warranty and seven-year servicing to McLaren’s three of each as standard.
The McLaren 750S is a triumph and runs the Italian close but it’s the Ferrari 296 GTB we recommend you put in the garage. Especially if you can grab one of those tempting used deals.
McLaren 750S vs Ferrari 296 GTB verdict
First place
Ferrari 296 GTB
Technically complex but sublime, whether in e-mode or at 8500rpm with the tyres on fire. A proper Ferrari.
Second place
McLaren 750S
Gritty authenticity meets boosty intimidation, yet compliant and useable too. Epic."
Video twin test: McLaren 750S vs Ferrari 296 GTB supercar battle
CAR magazine UK compares the new McLaren 750S supercar with the Ferrari 296 GTB with pictures and verdict
www.carmagazine.co.uk
Jonathan19
Premium+
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
One of finest English Journalists and currently hot Supercars meet. Should be very interesting.
He already compared the Artura to the 296 GTB and as far as I remember he prefered the Artura due to its feelsome steering etc. His verdict of the 750S will be interesting. I dont know but I prefer the look of the 750S to the 296GTB. The front lights on the Ferrari look too thin, although I do like the rear of the 296 very much.
One of finest English Journalists and currently hot Supercars meet. Should be very interesting.
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
The 296GTB is an impressive Supercar. But the McLarens are too. They'd need back to back drives!
Looks wise I agree.
I like his videos he is one of the most likeable motoring journalists out there.
One of finest English Journalists and currently hot Supercars meet. Should be very interesting.
Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
Jonathan19
Premium+
Similar threads
McLaren
McLaren Automotive is a British luxury automotive manufacturer founded in 1985 as McLaren Cars and later
re-introduced as McLaren Automotive in 2010. Based at the McLaren Technology Centre in Woking, England,
the company's main products are sports cars, which are produced in-house in designated production
facilities. In July 2017, McLaren Automotive became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the wider McLaren Group.
Official website: McLaren Automotive
Official website: McLaren Automotive
