And that Mercedes is an incredible tractor / dragster that quickly moves with that shape and weight, it's like an Egyptian pyramid with an engine
X3 M / X4 M [Official] The BMW X3 M (F97) and the BMW X4 M (F98)
- Thread starter Giannis
- Start date
In 2019, BMW introduced the X4 M and X4 M Competition (F98), being the first time an X4 had a M version. The X4 M is fitted with a 3.0 L S58 straight-six that produced 473 horsepower with the Competition models producing 503 horsepower. Full M models can be fitted with full M specific M Performance Parts. These include a splitter, spoiler, sport steering wheel, carbon fibre vents and kidney grilles.
hovabongZA
Tire Trailblazer
It really shouldn’t be that quick.
hovabongZA
Tire Trailblazer
Tuned X3/4Ms are not joke giving a hard beat down to hellcats.
nikola1984
Kraftkurve King
C&D
2020 BMW X4 M Competition Is One of the Quickest SUVs We've Tested
It may ride firmly and look funky, but BMW's fast-roof compact performance SUV is seriously capable on the road.
Much about the 2020 BMW X4 M Competition's casual disdain for Newton's various laws of motion impresses us, but it this crossover's acceleration figures that truly encapsulate its ludicrous capabilities. While its hunchbacked styling and squat stance are more hatchback than crossover, the range-topping X4 still is one of the quickest SUVs we have ever tested. Indeed, it's also one of the quickest M cars.
HIGHS: Hugely powerful turbo inline-six, impressive acceleration, massive grip.
A 3.3-second zero-to-60-mph time is impressive in anything, let alone a 4539-pound crossover that clearly has been styled to impress. In posting that time, the X4 M Competition falls but a tenth shy of the figures we recorded for both the Mercedes-AMG GLC63 S coupe and the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio, yet the BMW's 8.0-second pull to 100 mph is quicker than both. While the Lamborghini Urus still posts the quickest straight-line test results of any SUV we've sampled, the $81,395 X4 M Competition costs less than half its price.
A Compact SUV Rocket
This Bimmer's motivation comes from a new twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six, codenamed S58, which also will find its way into the next-generation M3 and M4 models. It is the most powerful road-going six-cylinder engine that BMW has ever made and will happily snarl all the way to its 7200-rpm redline. While the S58 in the non-Competition X4 M employs 17.4 psi of boost to generate 473 horsepower, the Competition's compressors huff 18.9 psi into the engine for a heady output of 503 horses. The huge output reaches the road through an eight-speed automatic transmission and an all-wheel-drive system that incorporates the same electronically controlled torque-biasing rear differential that is fitted to the BMW M5 super sedan.
LOWS: Firm ride, more expensive and less practical than the X3 M, inelegant hunchback design.
Despite the muscularity of its hardware, the abiding impression of the X4 M on the road is how usable it feels. The engine is happy to burble along at low speeds, with the automatic gearbox shifting intelligently to disguise the fact that there is some noticeable turbo lag below 3000 rpm, which you really only can detect when using the manual-shifting paddles on the back of the steering wheel. This BMW rides on steel coil springs rather than air springs, and although these are on the firm side of comfortable, standard adaptive dampers keep the ride relatively pliant over broken Michigan blacktop. Some drivers felt that the dampers' firmer Sport and Sport Plus settings were too unyielding for use away from a glass-smooth racetrack, yet others seemed to tolerate the X4 M's occasional buckboard impact harshness with little grumbling.
So Many Settings
This being a modern BMW M car, there are a multitude of dynamic chassis and powertrain settings that drivers can tweak to their heart's content in an almost-endless pursuit of the optimal setup. The X4 M also gets the same slightly confusing sideways-orientated gear selector as the M5 and M6, with which you slide right to go from Neutral to Drive or left and up to engage Reverse. The lever incorporates a small toggle to select three different gearshift programs of increasing severity. There also are separate buttons for adjusting the engine's aggressiveness, the suspension's stiffness, and the electrically assisted steering's weight through three modes, plus another button for the stability control's settings (on, Sport, and fully deactivated) and yet another for opening the flaps in the active exhaust system. What's more, the X4 M's xDrive all-wheel-drive system can be put into a more rear-biased AWD Sport mode but only with the stability control switched off. Small wonder there are two red M toggles on the steering wheel that can activate separate, driver-selected profiles for all of the available settings.
Our experience with the X4 M suggested that most drivers will quickly cut through the myriad of choices. We found little reason not to stick with the steering's softest Comfort setting, which allows some natural feedback to reach the rim without the artificial weight added by Sport and Sport Plus modes. Similarly, we can't see much use for the powertrain's Efficient setting in a 500-hp SUV, which seems to do little but kill the turbo-six's throttle response. The all-wheel-drive system works by sending as much torque as it can to the rear axle and diverting it forward only when slip is detected. The Sport and Sport Plus drive modes both raise the intervention threshold for slippage and make the car feel more edgy and exciting without becoming wayward. (Unlike the M5 and M6, there is no rear-drive-only mode.)
Grip levels are massive, the X4 M generating a sticky 0.97 g of lateral acceleration around the skidpad on its 21-inch Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires; the GLC63 S managed 0.94 g, and the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quad topped out at 0.95 g. On the road the X4 M shows impressive agility considering its considerable mass. Yet, while it turns keenly and accurately we noticed that the steering feels overly springy if you release the wheel with lock applied. Braking is handled by 15.6-inch rotors with four-piston calipers at the front and 14.6-inch rotors with single pistons at the rear, which are savagely effective, bringing the BMW to a stop from 70 mph in just 147 feet.
Capable but Compromised
Like the regular X4, the M is one of those crossovers where design is more important than raw practicality. It is a lifestyle statement. The rear seat is cramped for adult occupants, who will suffer a shortage of both knee and headroom and also will have to endure the upright angle of the seatback. The mechanically identical BMW X3 M is considerably more spacious inside, as well as handsomer (if less visually striking) on the outside.
In addition to the Competition model's increased power output, it also brings a standard sport exhaust system, larger anti-roll bars, and 21-inch wheels, plus the all-important Competition badge that sits beneath the X4 M emblem on the rear hatch. Whether all this justifies the $7000 premium that BMW charges for the Competition over the regular X4 M is a fair question, but for the car's target market, such considerations are unlikely to matter too much. If you want the quickest SUV under $100K, this is the current champion
Testing Data
VEHICLE TYPE
front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback
PRICE AS TESTED
$86,495 (base price: $81,395)
ENGINE TYPE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection
Displacement
183 cu in, 2993 cc
Power
503 hp @ 7300 rpm
Torque
442 lb-ft @ 2600 rpm
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension (F/R): strut/multilink
Brakes (F/R): 15.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc/14.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc
Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, F: 255/40R-21 (103Y) ★ R: 265/40R-21 (105Y) ★
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 112.8 in
Length: 187.5 in
Width: 75.9 in
Height: 63.8 in
Passenger volume: 96 cu ft
Cargo volume: 19 cu ft
Curb weight: 4539 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
Rollout, 1 ft: 0.2 sec
60 mph: 3.3 sec
100 mph: 8.0 sec
150 mph: 21.5 sec
Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 4.6 sec
Top gear, 30–50 mph: 2.7 sec
Top gear, 50–70 mph: 3.1 sec
¼-mile: 11.6 sec @ 119 mph
Top speed (governor limited, mfr's claim): 161 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 147 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.97 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 15 mpg
75-mph highway driving: 26 mpg
Highway range: 440 miles
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/city/highway: 16/14/19 mpg
2020 BMW X4 M Competition Is One of the Quickest SUVs We've Tested
It may ride firmly and look funky, but BMW's fast-roof compact performance SUV is seriously capable on the road.
Much about the 2020 BMW X4 M Competition's casual disdain for Newton's various laws of motion impresses us, but it this crossover's acceleration figures that truly encapsulate its ludicrous capabilities. While its hunchbacked styling and squat stance are more hatchback than crossover, the range-topping X4 still is one of the quickest SUVs we have ever tested. Indeed, it's also one of the quickest M cars.
HIGHS: Hugely powerful turbo inline-six, impressive acceleration, massive grip.
A 3.3-second zero-to-60-mph time is impressive in anything, let alone a 4539-pound crossover that clearly has been styled to impress. In posting that time, the X4 M Competition falls but a tenth shy of the figures we recorded for both the Mercedes-AMG GLC63 S coupe and the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio, yet the BMW's 8.0-second pull to 100 mph is quicker than both. While the Lamborghini Urus still posts the quickest straight-line test results of any SUV we've sampled, the $81,395 X4 M Competition costs less than half its price.
A Compact SUV Rocket
This Bimmer's motivation comes from a new twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six, codenamed S58, which also will find its way into the next-generation M3 and M4 models. It is the most powerful road-going six-cylinder engine that BMW has ever made and will happily snarl all the way to its 7200-rpm redline. While the S58 in the non-Competition X4 M employs 17.4 psi of boost to generate 473 horsepower, the Competition's compressors huff 18.9 psi into the engine for a heady output of 503 horses. The huge output reaches the road through an eight-speed automatic transmission and an all-wheel-drive system that incorporates the same electronically controlled torque-biasing rear differential that is fitted to the BMW M5 super sedan.
LOWS: Firm ride, more expensive and less practical than the X3 M, inelegant hunchback design.
Despite the muscularity of its hardware, the abiding impression of the X4 M on the road is how usable it feels. The engine is happy to burble along at low speeds, with the automatic gearbox shifting intelligently to disguise the fact that there is some noticeable turbo lag below 3000 rpm, which you really only can detect when using the manual-shifting paddles on the back of the steering wheel. This BMW rides on steel coil springs rather than air springs, and although these are on the firm side of comfortable, standard adaptive dampers keep the ride relatively pliant over broken Michigan blacktop. Some drivers felt that the dampers' firmer Sport and Sport Plus settings were too unyielding for use away from a glass-smooth racetrack, yet others seemed to tolerate the X4 M's occasional buckboard impact harshness with little grumbling.
So Many Settings
This being a modern BMW M car, there are a multitude of dynamic chassis and powertrain settings that drivers can tweak to their heart's content in an almost-endless pursuit of the optimal setup. The X4 M also gets the same slightly confusing sideways-orientated gear selector as the M5 and M6, with which you slide right to go from Neutral to Drive or left and up to engage Reverse. The lever incorporates a small toggle to select three different gearshift programs of increasing severity. There also are separate buttons for adjusting the engine's aggressiveness, the suspension's stiffness, and the electrically assisted steering's weight through three modes, plus another button for the stability control's settings (on, Sport, and fully deactivated) and yet another for opening the flaps in the active exhaust system. What's more, the X4 M's xDrive all-wheel-drive system can be put into a more rear-biased AWD Sport mode but only with the stability control switched off. Small wonder there are two red M toggles on the steering wheel that can activate separate, driver-selected profiles for all of the available settings.
Our experience with the X4 M suggested that most drivers will quickly cut through the myriad of choices. We found little reason not to stick with the steering's softest Comfort setting, which allows some natural feedback to reach the rim without the artificial weight added by Sport and Sport Plus modes. Similarly, we can't see much use for the powertrain's Efficient setting in a 500-hp SUV, which seems to do little but kill the turbo-six's throttle response. The all-wheel-drive system works by sending as much torque as it can to the rear axle and diverting it forward only when slip is detected. The Sport and Sport Plus drive modes both raise the intervention threshold for slippage and make the car feel more edgy and exciting without becoming wayward. (Unlike the M5 and M6, there is no rear-drive-only mode.)
Grip levels are massive, the X4 M generating a sticky 0.97 g of lateral acceleration around the skidpad on its 21-inch Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires; the GLC63 S managed 0.94 g, and the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quad topped out at 0.95 g. On the road the X4 M shows impressive agility considering its considerable mass. Yet, while it turns keenly and accurately we noticed that the steering feels overly springy if you release the wheel with lock applied. Braking is handled by 15.6-inch rotors with four-piston calipers at the front and 14.6-inch rotors with single pistons at the rear, which are savagely effective, bringing the BMW to a stop from 70 mph in just 147 feet.
Capable but Compromised
Like the regular X4, the M is one of those crossovers where design is more important than raw practicality. It is a lifestyle statement. The rear seat is cramped for adult occupants, who will suffer a shortage of both knee and headroom and also will have to endure the upright angle of the seatback. The mechanically identical BMW X3 M is considerably more spacious inside, as well as handsomer (if less visually striking) on the outside.
In addition to the Competition model's increased power output, it also brings a standard sport exhaust system, larger anti-roll bars, and 21-inch wheels, plus the all-important Competition badge that sits beneath the X4 M emblem on the rear hatch. Whether all this justifies the $7000 premium that BMW charges for the Competition over the regular X4 M is a fair question, but for the car's target market, such considerations are unlikely to matter too much. If you want the quickest SUV under $100K, this is the current champion
Testing Data
VEHICLE TYPE
front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback
PRICE AS TESTED
$86,495 (base price: $81,395)
ENGINE TYPE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection
Displacement
183 cu in, 2993 cc
Power
503 hp @ 7300 rpm
Torque
442 lb-ft @ 2600 rpm
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension (F/R): strut/multilink
Brakes (F/R): 15.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc/14.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc
Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, F: 255/40R-21 (103Y) ★ R: 265/40R-21 (105Y) ★
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 112.8 in
Length: 187.5 in
Width: 75.9 in
Height: 63.8 in
Passenger volume: 96 cu ft
Cargo volume: 19 cu ft
Curb weight: 4539 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
Rollout, 1 ft: 0.2 sec
60 mph: 3.3 sec
100 mph: 8.0 sec
150 mph: 21.5 sec
Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 4.6 sec
Top gear, 30–50 mph: 2.7 sec
Top gear, 50–70 mph: 3.1 sec
¼-mile: 11.6 sec @ 119 mph
Top speed (governor limited, mfr's claim): 161 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 147 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.97 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 15 mpg
75-mph highway driving: 26 mpg
Highway range: 440 miles
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/city/highway: 16/14/19 mpg
SCOTT27
Drift Dynamo
Sadly, yes.
drifter1
Tarmac Traveler
2020 BMW X3M Competition
Base Price/As Tested $77,895/$83,845
Power (SAE net) 503 hp @ 5,950 rpm
Torque (SAE net) 442 lb-ft @ 2,600 rpm
Accel, 0-60 mph 4.0 sec
Quarter Mile 12.3 sec @ 117.3 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph 104 ft
Lateral Acceleration 0.95 g (avg)
MT Figure Eight 24.2 sec @ 0.86 g (avg)
EPA City/Hwy/Comb 14/19/16 mpg
Source: Motor Trend
Base Price/As Tested $77,895/$83,845
Power (SAE net) 503 hp @ 5,950 rpm
Torque (SAE net) 442 lb-ft @ 2,600 rpm
Accel, 0-60 mph 4.0 sec
Quarter Mile 12.3 sec @ 117.3 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph 104 ft
Lateral Acceleration 0.95 g (avg)
MT Figure Eight 24.2 sec @ 0.86 g (avg)
EPA City/Hwy/Comb 14/19/16 mpg
Source: Motor Trend
Centurion
Apex Apex Predator
Or imagine a next generation M2 Competition with the same engine.
as7920
Autobahn Adventurer
Fuel Economy observed 11.5L/km = 21.38 mpg
So far, I did my best FE the last 2 days, with 606km done and haded 56 liters of Petrol which gave 9.5L/100km = 26.13 mpg
and hopefully I was not stuck in traffic jam, otherwise, no way to get 440 miles of range. In reality, this is the second time I pass the 600 km (372 miles).
hovabongZA
Tire Trailblazer
Jaguar F-Pace SVR vs BMW X3 M Competition vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Q comparison
https:/www.whichcar.com.au/reviews/car-comparisons/jaguar-f-pace-svr-vs-bmw-x3-m-competition-vs-alfa-romeo-stelvio-q-comparison
https:/www.whichcar.com.au/reviews/car-comparisons/jaguar-f-pace-svr-vs-bmw-x3-m-competition-vs-alfa-romeo-stelvio-q-comparison
manuelf
Kraftkurve King
What is interessting imho: with the non-SUV M cars BMW is typically the lightest among its competition. Not so with its SUVs! Alfa delivered an incredibly light power SUV here with only 1830kg measured weight! 150kg less than the X3M! So there is something to improve for BMW for its next SUV generation ...
Fuel Economy observed 11.5L/km = 21.38 mpg
So far, I did my best FE the last 2 days, with 606km done and haded 56 liters of Petrol which gave 9.5L/100km = 26.13 mpg
and hopefully I was not stuck in traffic jam, otherwise, no way to get 440 miles of range. In reality, this is the second time I pass the 600 km (372 miles).
These figures are U.S. mpg, in which case the fuel economy is better than I first thought.
I still don't get these cars: not good for towing, not good for off-roading, not better for all-terraining on degraded roads than Subaru, not enough space/seats for stuff/people, slower/heavier than M3, not more comfortable than M3, not baller status like X5 M/X7 M, not as stylish as a Coupe,.... can't think of them anything other than a fool's car, and women's car at that. Men drive the big Xs at least.
Centurion
Apex Apex Predator
Many jumped on these in December 2019 when BMW were offering the X3M for £550down and £550/month for 48 months if you took delivery before the 31st of December.
hovabongZA
Tire Trailblazer
The M3/4 are going to be absolutely deadly!
Similar threads
BMW M
BMW M GmbH, formerly known as BMW Motorsport GmbH, is a subsidiary of
BMW AG that manufactures high-performance luxury cars. BMW M ("M" for "motorsport")
was initially created to facilitate BMW's racing program, which was very successful
in the 1960s and 1970s. As time passed, BMW M began to supplement BMW's vehicle
portfolio with specially modified higher trim models, for which they are now most
known by the general public. These M-badged cars traditionally include modified engines,
transmissions, suspensions, interior trims, aerodynamics, and exterior modifications
to set them apart from their counterparts. All M models are tested and tuned at BMW's
private facility at the Nürburgring racing circuit in Germany.
Official website: BMW M
Official website: BMW M
