Hot! Mercedes-Benz, What's Next?

[Esp5]

Speaking about the EQE/EQE SUV, they're killing these models after barely four years on the market (until 2026). They haven't even managed to reach their FL, astonishing.

The C and GLC EVs were supposed to add models, but instead they'll be without EVs in the mid-range segment for a whole year in the case of the sedan (until the E-Class EV arrives), and who knows how long in the case of the SUV.

Less than 10 days ago I read that Ola indicated they would update the EQE to 800v with the new platform, etc., and 20 minutes later they cancel the car and the SUV entirely. The bad news must be enormous to act so vehemently improvised. It's not even serious anymore.

Are there examples of models of any brand canceled mid-cycle due to selling so poorly?

 

[leylandi]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Gor134]

We should be seeing the new model instead of another facelift though. This car is 6 years old.

They're doing what Audi did with the Q7, extending life cycle with a 2nd facelift for a short 2-year run. New gen GLS/GLE will come MY2028 in 2027

 

[leylandi]

It will be released in 2026 and will receive a major facelift. Therefore, it will be sold for another three years.

 

[Swissbob]

It’s still a very good car.

 

[SKY]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Seems like the new front end that MB will spread across the entire line up is not compatible with the inverted grille of the current GLE AMG.

A pitty, I do like the current car...

 

[leylandi]

I think it will look great. The inverted grille would spoil the Mercedes identity.

 

[klier]

I just hope they don't f#ck up the interior.

 

[Luca]

 

[Merc1]

What is that???

M

 

[SKY]

What is that???

M

Layout seems to be the same as the C-Class and GLC one. Considering the GLC EV is around the corner, I would say this is its new interior.

 

[Design FIRST]

Layout seems to be the same as the C-Class and GLC one. Considering the GLC EV is around the corner, I would say this is its new interior.

Maybe the angle of the shot being deceiving... But the apparent rake of the A-pillars could indicate the upcoming C-Class "EQ Technology" sedan.

 

[Merc1]

It does look good, but of course if it's real we need to see more.

M

 

[Rolf]

It all makes much sense. As normal looking, more advanced EVs start being available, the older, turd-looking ones are phased out.

I bet MB would like to do the same with the EQS range.

Personally, I think they would prefer to get rid of the EQS models but due to the longer wait for the S-class ICE and EV replacement in 2028/2029, they need an electric car to still fill in that gap for reducing the emissions in this luxury class level. So, for 2 years the FL or MOPF EQS and EQS SUV will be in that sector and its good at least it will get updated EV tech with 800V, faster charging, smaller and more compact electric motors and a more efficient battery pack. The EQS should be able to have over 900km EV range in its MOPF updates with 20min or less charging for 10% to 80%.

 

[Merc1]

They seem to be good EVs, but the styling, price and quality just didn't add up to buyers. I've asked a few people I've seen here and there with EQS sedans and EQE SUVs, and they love the cars. Really interesting.

M

 

[Rolf]

They seem to be good EVs, but the styling, price and quality just didn't add up to buyers. I've asked a few people I've seen here and there with EQS sedans and EQE SUVs, and they love the cars. Really interesting.

M

The EQE and EQS models have received good reviews from motoring journalists for the way they drive, their refinement and comfort and their EV range. I think it's mostly the styling that turns people off and the quality of the interior is not stellar and up to the ICE models. The EQS has been criticized for its back seat not providing the usual comfort of an S-class especially that it lacks the stretch out heavy rake adjustment seats and space.

 

[TATE]

Artificial inteligente pic I am afraid

 

[Design FIRST]

Personally, I think they would prefer to get rid of the EQS models but due to the longer wait for the S-class ICE and EV replacement in 2028/2029, they need an electric car to still fill in that gap for reducing the emissions in this luxury class level. So, for 2 years the FL or MOPF EQS and EQS SUV will be in that sector and its good at least it will get updated EV tech with 800V, faster charging, smaller and more compact electric motors and a more efficient battery pack. The EQS should be able to have over 900km EV range in its MOPF updates with 20min or less charging for 10% to 80%.

Mercedes-Benz is deeply rooted in engineering prowess and cutting edge innovation. In these particular aspects, it remains a formidable automotive force. Sadly, it has it's assorted episodes of stumbling regarding material and assembly quality inside and out, questionable design inside and out and the occasional electronics niggles. Not to mention, at times, very poor advertising. On paper, the tech qualities of the EQS are very impressive. It is clear where this car has faltered and eventually...failed. It is also testimony to the major significance of sound, eye pleasing design and how it is presented in a compelling, tasteful manner. It should be ALL about THE VEHICLE. Not "agendas", celebrities or self-promotion of corporate executives.

 

[hannaz]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Rolf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I hope that the GLE doesn't receive a copy past interior of the EQE/EQS or E-class. It would be great to see some fresh design for this and the GLS interior. They need to stand out from the rest of the line up with cutting edge tech and distinguished interior with finer materials.

Mercedes-Benz is deeply rooted in engineering prowess and cutting edge innovation. In these particular aspects, it remains a formidable automotive force. Sadly, it has it's assorted episodes of stumbling regarding material and assembly quality inside and out, questionable design inside and out and the occasional electronics niggles. Not to mention, at times, very poor advertising. On paper, the tech qualities of the EQS are very impressive. It is clear where this car has faltered and eventually...failed. It is also testimony to the major significance of sound, eye pleasing design and how it is presented in a compelling, tasteful manner. It should be ALL about THE VEHICLE. Not "agendas", celebrities or self-promotion of corporate executives.

I agree with you, Mercedes is still a force to be reckoned with the latest car safety, powertrain and in car electronic systems, but their design and interior quality have seen some weaknesses in the last 2 generations of cars. Their reliability also seems to have taken a back seat in recent models. Its understandable they need to monitor their costs and profits, but it mustn't come at the expense of the core things of Mercedes that makes them stand out from cheaper cars, their unburstable quality, comfort and refinement. If these are compromised, then other brands will definitely take advantage and ultimately the 3-pointed star will be the losing team and be responsible of their own stupid mistakes.